After testing the Pro Max model in September, the results for the iPhone 16’s DXOMARK camera have been released, placing it at #20 in the rankings.
The organization highlights that, despite the camera hardware being nearly the same as the iPhone 15, software enhancements have led to improved scores in various areas.
iPhone 16 DXOMARK Camera Results
Back in September, DXOMARK revealed the iPhone 16 Pro Max’s test results, where it achieved #4 overall and was ranked #1 for video quality.
Now, similar assessments have been conducted on the standard model, which received a total score of 147, compared to 157 for the Pro Max.
The Apple iPhone 16 showcased commendable performance in the DXOMARK Camera tests for its category. Most of its camera hardware mirrors that of its predecessor, but some software upgrades have resulted in notable improvements across various testing aspects. The camera excelled in capturing vibrant still images and videos with excellent exposure, strong contrast, and natural skin tones. Video stabilization was effective, maintaining smoothness during movement. However, the lack of a dedicated telephoto lens diminished detail and texture in medium to long-range shots.
DXOMARK is recognized for its rigorous testing methodologies, combining scientific evaluations in the lab with practical shooting scenarios. In total, smartphone cameras are rated across 17 distinct categories.
- Eight strengths identified:
- Impressive brightness and contrast on HDR displays
- Natural skin tones and vibrant colors in both photos and videos
- Exceptional detail in bright conditions and indoor settings
- Quick and generally precise autofocus
- Smooth zoom functionality in previews
- Bold brightness and contrast in HDR video playback
- Video noise is typically well managed
- Highly effective video stabilization
And six drawbacks:
- Restricted dynamic range may lead to highlight clipping in both photos and videos
- Presence of flare, hue shift artifacts, and ringing in images
- Limited capabilities for long-range telephoto zoom
- Loss of fine detail in videos, particularly in low-light situations
- Visible artifacts like flare, motion texture in low light, and aliasing in video
- Noise present in shadow areas and low-light images
The device earned peak scores for exposure and color accuracy, achieving 124/30 and 129/130 respectively.
Video performance was rated very high at 154/159, comparable to the top score held by the Pro Max.
Video quality was exemplary for this category of device. Overall, video performance mirrored that of the predecessor, with testers noting improvements, especially in color with enhanced white balance. The new model also delivered superior video texture, albeit with slightly more intrusive noise compared to last year’s iteration.
Photo: Amanz on Unsplash
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
