Which Bitcoin ETF Is the Best Investment?

Bitcoin Spot ETFs have become a popular method for investors looking to enter the bitcoin market, which has seen remarkable returns since its introduction in 2009. In 2024, the SEC approved initiatives such as IBIT and FBTC, enabling both retail and institutional investors to access bitcoin on stock exchanges alongside other investments like the leading stocks for 2025.

This article will explore the principal differences between the iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) and the Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC), comparing them in terms of fees, performance, management, and security. While these bitcoin ETFs may not suit risk-averse investors or those who prefer direct ownership of bitcoin, they offer a pathway to engage with a rapidly mainstreaming asset.

Why Invest in Bitcoin ETFs Like IBIT and FBTC?

Investors may be drawn to bitcoin due to its outstanding performance, recording a staggering 47,116.2% increase over the past decade and 997.9% over the past five years. Depending on individual perspectives, bitcoin can function as a speculative investment, an alternative store of value akin to gold, or a currency for transactions. A bitcoin ETF is ideal for those seeking exposure to bitcoin as a speculative investment, potentially reaping rewards from its appreciation.

Spot ETFs like IBIT and FBTC allow investors to capitalize on bitcoin price movements through standard brokerage accounts without the need to manage bitcoin ownership. These ETFs provide liquidity, regulatory oversight, and simple trading alongside traditional investments like stocks, bonds, and other funds.

For those who only wish to invest in bitcoin, avoiding other cryptocurrencies such as Ethereum or Solana, bitcoin ETFs like IBIT and FBTC represent a convenient option compared to trading on platforms like Coinbase.

The Basics of IBIT and FBTC at a Glance

Both IBIT and FBTC aim to track bitcoin price movements, differing in fees, structure, and management. They are both traded on significant stock exchanges like the NYSE, facilitating broad access for retail and institutional investors.

What is IBIT?

IBIT is a bitcoin ETF managed by BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, currently overseeing $11.6 trillion in assets. This ETF provides direct bitcoin exposure by holding bitcoin relative to its shares. BlackRock’s established reputation in fund management enhances the credibility of its bitcoin ETF.

What is FBTC?

FBTC is a bitcoin ETF managed by Fidelity, another prominent asset manager, overseeing $5.8 trillion in assets. Similar to IBIT, FBTC holds bitcoin against its shares to ensure accurate price tracking. Fidelity is favored by retail investors, while BlackRock appeals more to institutional clients. Fidelity has a long history of engaging with cryptocurrency, dating back to 2014 when it began researching digital assets and blockchain technology.

Key Differences Between IBIT and FBTC

Historical Performance Comparison

IBIT and FBTC closely track bitcoin prices, with FBTC slightly outperforming IBIT in 1-year returns at 137.65% compared to 137.32%. Overall future performance is contingent on bitcoin price movements and effective custody management by the ETFs’ providers.

Comparing IBIT and FBTC Holdings

Both ETFs primarily invest in bitcoin, making their core holdings identical. Any variations in performance are likely attributable to management strategies and liquidity conditions.

IBIT vs. FBTC Dividend Yields

Bitcoin does not generate income like bonds or dividend stocks; hence, neither IBIT nor FBTC offers dividend returns. These bitcoin ETFs are more suited for investors seeking capital appreciation instead of yield from dividends.

Market Sentiment and Trends

As a speculative asset, bitcoin is prone to significant price fluctuations, which may be unfamiliar to traditional investors. For instance, in February 2025, bitcoin suffered a 17% drop, followed by a 10% rebound in March due to speculation regarding a U.S. strategic cryptocurrency reserve. Should the U.S. government establish such a reserve, further institutional adoption of bitcoin could ensue.

The launch of IBIT and FBTC in 2024 fostered the adoption of bitcoin, providing easier investment avenues for both retail and institutional investors. Public companies, including Microstrategy, are incorporating bitcoin into their balance sheets, alongside asset managers seeking to diversify their portfolios. With increasing regulatory clarity from the SEC, more investors may feel emboldened to invest in bitcoin, subsequently driving growth in market capitalization and pricing.

IBIT and FBTC Risk Comparisons

Bitcoin’s volatility extends to IBIT and FBTC, where prices can fluctuate due to market news or sentiment shifts. While regulatory clarity is improving, potential adverse regulatory actions could impact the asset’s pricing and availability in various markets. Moreover, both ETFs may face custodial risks, such as hacks or mishandling of assets.

Investors should assess their risk tolerance before diving into bitcoin ETFs like IBIT or FBTC. A prudent guideline for bitcoin investments is to avoid investing amounts that could cause significant distress if lost entirely.

Tax Considerations

Bitcoin ETFs are subject to both short-term and long-term capital gains taxes, similar to direct bitcoin holdings. One notable tax advantage is that bitcoin ETFs can easily be incorporated into traditional or Roth IRAs, unlike direct bitcoin holdings. This can enhance tax efficiency as it may allow for tax deferral on gains within a traditional IRA or exemption from gains tax with a Roth IRA.

Consulting a cryptocurrency-savvy tax professional is advisable if you’re concerned about the tax implications of investing in bitcoin ETFs.

IBIT vs. FBTC: Pros and Cons

While both IBIT and FBTC function as comparable bitcoin Spot ETFs, they present differences in expense ratios, asset management strengths, and custody strategies.

IBIT Pros

• Lower Expense Ratio: IBIT features a modestly lower expense ratio of 0.12% compared to FBTC’s 0.25%.
• Strong Institutional Support: BlackRock, the largest global asset manager, oversees over $11 trillion in assets.
• High Liquidity: IBIT is likely to attract substantial institutional investment, boasting higher net assets totaling $48.8 billion.

IBIT Cons

• Slightly Lower Performance: IBIT recorded a 1-year return that underperformed FBTC by 33 basis points.
• Shorter Crypto Track Record: BlackRock began offering cryptocurrency products like futures in 2021.
• Third-Party Custody: IBIT utilizes Coinbase Prime for custody, a common practice among bitcoin ETFs, leading to potential third-party risks compared to FBTC’s self-custody model.

FBTC Pros

• Cryptocurrency Expertise: Fidelity brings over a decade of experience in cryptocurrency, which may enhance its management and security.
• Self Custody: FBTC’s bitcoin is self-custodied by Fidelity via Fidelity Digital Assets, possibly offering superior security.
• Slight Outperformance: FBTC achieved marginally better performance than IBIT over a 1-year period by 33 basis points.

FBTC Cons

• Higher Expense Ratio: FBTC’s expense ratio stands at 0.25%, above IBIT’s.
• Potentially Lower Liquidity: FBTC’s net assets are lower than IBIT’s, at $16.6 billion.
• Lower Institutional Support: While significant, Fidelity’s institutional usage doesn’t match BlackRock’s scale.

Investor Suitability

IBIT is potentially more appropriate for investors seeking to track bitcoin price movements while benefiting from a comparatively lower expense ratio of 0.12%, backed by the world’s leading asset manager. Meanwhile, FBTC might appeal to investors willing to accept a higher expense ratio for Fidelity’s self-custody model and extensive cryptocurrency expertise.

Investors should delve into both firms’ security protocols for asset custody and consider researching alternative bitcoin Spot ETFs or holding cryptocurrencies directly as viable options.

Bottom Line

IBIT and FBTC share considerable similarities as ETFs tracking bitcoin. Both provide effective mechanisms for investors to gain bitcoin exposure with relatively low expense ratios from reputable asset managers. The choice between the two ultimately hinges on factors such as reputation, minor differences in expense ratios and performance, as well as each firm’s approach to bitcoin custody.

Adding Bitcoin via a Spot ETF can be a thrilling enhancement to any portfolio. Given the inevitable price fluctuations, its strong historical performance over major indexes like the S&P 500 since inception signals a robust investment potential. The introduction of IBIT and FBTC through BlackRock and Fidelity showcases a significant mainstream interest and adoption by the financial sector, offering more investors the chance for impressive returns.

Read Next